Blogs Etc. Travel Weather Health Tech/Science Entertainment Sports Business World News Politics U.S. news Home
















2007 in Review
2006 in Review
2005 in Review
2004 in Review

2002 in Review

Our Cartoons for YOU

Daryl Cagle's Cartoon Web Log!
Click here to comment. CURRENT - JAN/APRIL'08 - SEP/OCT/NOV/DEC'07 - JULY/AUG'07 - MAY/JUNE'07 - MAR/APR'07 - JAN/FEB'07 - NOV/DEC'06 - SEPT/OCT'06 - JULY/AUG'06 - JUNE'06 - APR/MAY'06 - MAR'06 - FEB'06 - JAN'06- DEC'05 - NOV'05 - OCT''05 - SEPT''05 - JULY-AUG'05 - JUNE''05 - MAY'05 - FEB'05 - APR'05 - MAR'05 - FEB'05 - DEC'04/JAN'05 - NOV'04 - SEP/OCT'04 - AUGUST'04 - JULY'04 - JUNE'04 - MAY'04 - APR'04 - MAR''04 -FEB'04 - JAN''04 - DEC'03 - NOV''03 - OCT'03- SEPT'03- AUG'03 - JULY'03

August 28, 2007

Sandy Huffaker's Paintings

I grew up back in the 1970's and 1980's as a fan of Sandy Huffaker's political cartoon illustrations in Time Magazine. Sandy retired from the illustration grind and moved to a farm in rural Virginia to concentrate on oil painting. A few years ago Sandy was drawn away from his sleepy farm life, back to being a political cartoonist, but he still lives on his ranch and still paints. Sandy offers his paintings for sale and sells affordable Giclee fine art prints. E-mail Sandy at: huffaker@rockbridge.net. As with his political cartoons, I think there is something a little disturbing about Sandy's paintings, although that one with the cow peeing would look chaming in any bathroom.


Sandy's Neighbors, Oil on Masonite


"The Girls Like a REAL MAN", 12" x 9", oil on masonite


"Who are YOU?!!", 14" x 10", oil on masonite


"Life is GOOD!", 10" x 8", oil on masonite


"VA Horse Center", 16" x 13", oil on masonite

 

Dan Reynolds and Van Gogh

We just put up a new collection of cartoons called "The Secret Lives of Farm Animals" by our favorite greeting card artist, Dan Reynolds. It turns out that Dan also dabbles in oil painting and is a fan of Vincent Van Gogh. A couple of Dan's paintings are below. Want to know more about Dan's paintings and his free fan e-mail newsletter? Just ask Dan at: cartoonist89@hotmail.com



August 21, 2007

Jimmy Margulies Wins Clarion Award


Congratulations to my buddy, Jimmy Margulies, for winning this year's Clarion Award. Jimmy's win is well deserved!

Oh ... Those Awards ...

Whenever I post something here about a cartoonist winning an award, I get e-mails from other cartoonists, reminding me of the things I've said about awards for editorial cartooning in the past, and I get bashed for even mentioning award winners in the blog.

We're a competitive bunch, and our profession has fallen on hard times, so I suppose it is natural for cartoonists to want to seek consolation in awards; that's fine with me - but I think editorial cartoonists put much too much stock in awards and spend too much time chasing and worrying about awards.

Often the awards encourage cartoonists to do drawings that they wouldn't otherwise draw, or push their careers in wrongheaded directions where cartoonists otherwise wouldn't go - all for the glory of awards. Last year's Pulitzer Prize is a good example; all of the nominees did web animations and it was clear that the Pulitzer jury was making a statement that editorial cartoonists who want to win awards should be doing web animations. It now looks like editorial cartoonists are following that empty headed dictum from the Pulitzer jury, with more and more cartoonists jumping into Flash animated cartoons when there is no market for animated web cartoons - just the perception that there might be a prize in it for them, somewhere, spurs cartoonists into making a poor business choice.

Some contests focus on specific subjects, encouraging cartoonists to draw cartoons on those subjects to enter the contest. These contests, often sponsored by advocacy groups, are intended to push cartoonists to draw on topics that they otherwise wouldn't, and to place the point of view of the advocacy group onto the editorial pages. I complained here about a contest sponsored by a telemarketing advocacy organization for cartoons depicting poor, beleaguered, telemarketers. The Association of American Editorial Cartoonists web site now has an announcement of the winners of the "Life Without Fair Courts" contest, sponsored by "Lambda Legal" a group that describes itself as "a national organization committed to achieving full recognition of the civil rights of lesbians, gay men, bisexuals, transgender people, and those with HIV through litigation, education, and public policy work."

I wonder if the ethical standards of journalists would be questioned if they wrote sympathetic stories on issues that they otherwise wouldn't write, just to win awards from advocacy groups. I'm fine with these advocacy contests, so long as the cartoonist is drawing what he normally would every day, and submitting those cartoons to the contest. It is hard to know if the cartoonist would have drawn a cartoon anyway. (I submitted a a couple of old cartoons to the telemarketing contest, bashing telemarketers, and I actually won something.)

Awards can be more than PR schemes; the mad rush for awards creates a nifty business opportunity. The Clarion Awards charge a $120.00 entry fee for non-members of the Association for Women in Communications that runs the awards. Members pay $85.00 to enter. There are 82 different award categories. The winners get trophies; there are no cash awards. It doesn't take a math genius to figure out that with only a handful of submissions in each category, this thing is a gold mine! Yipes! I'm in the wrong business!

These contests can be like buying a Lotto ticket. I don't really think about the odds of winning when I buy a Lotto ticket. I don't think of the cost of the ticket. I just want to win win win! Damn the cost!

Want to comment on my rant about awards? E-mail us at cari@cagle.com


August 15, 2007

Say Goodbye to Cartoonists and Press Freedom in Kenya

I received the letter below from Cartoonist Relief network Executive Director, Bro Russell. It looks like Kenya is going the way of abolishing a free press. In countries withno free press, Cuba for example, journalist must be approved or licensed; the argument is that journalists must be "qualified" - but it is simply an excuse for making sure that journalists tow the party line, with the threat that their journalism permit can be revoked, or never granted in the first place if the journalist doesn't meet government "standards". The approved "journalists" in Cuba feign disgust and surprise at the American system, arguing that it is important that journalists be "qualified."


Daryl,

There is some controversy brewing about a proposed Media Bill now moving thru the Parliamentary system in Kenya. Vetted and apparently originally proposed by a group of media owners trying to stave off more repressive government threats to the media, it is shockingly anti-free speech and proposes to make it illegal for journalists, when brought into court, to refuse to reveal their sources.

We have been working with Patrick Gathera, the head of "KATUNI" the East African Cartoonists Association on this for about 2 weeks now.

While most of the hoopla from free speech organizations deal with the sources issue, another lesser quoted feature of the proposed Bill says that only college educated journalists will be accredited by the new Media Council that will be created by the bill. There are no college educated political cartoonists in Kenya.

The other free expression organizations addressing the Bill's shortcomings have entirely failed to see the danger in limiting journalism to only college educated reporters, and the other hidden threat, the idea of "registering" journalists at all. The quasi governmental Media Council created by this Bill will in fact become a licensing agency that will determine who can and who can't be an accredited media worker in Kenya. This was the issue that Tony Namate, our CRNI award winning cartoonist client in Zimbabwe has fought for so long and hard in Zimbabwe, risking his life and limb for sticking to his guns and refusing to be registered.

We hope that someone in the print media here in the US will take the lead and run some stories about this issue, it would make all the difference in Kenya at the moment. It is clear that the President in Kenya will send the Bill back to Parliament for a review, but nobody is talking about the education requirement that would put cartoonists out of business.

Bro

Bro gave me this link to an IFEX article on the Kenya issue. E-mail Bro. The cartoon below is by Kenyan cartoonist Patrick Gathara.


August 14, 2007

Karl Rove's Brain Yahtzee

Oh dear! I fell into this one! Click here to see all of the Karl Rove Resigns cartoons.

And, you all have my apologies!


Daryl Cagle, MSNBC.com


Ed Stein, The Rocky Mountain News


Steve Greenberg, The Ventura County Star


Stephane Peray, Thailand



Christo Komarnitsky, Bulgaria


August 9, 2007

Cagle Cartoons Want to Hire a Cartoon Fan Tech Guy!

Are you a programmer and systems administrator who loves politicalcartoons and wants a work-at-home job, working with us? We're cool, fun and flexible and we have lots of great projects going on that a cartoon wonk would really appreciate. If you're interested, check out our ad on Craigslist.


August 9, 2007

The Golden Spike

The Association of American Editorial Cartoonists (AAEC) gives a yearly "Golden Spike" award for the best cartoon that was killed by an editor. The idea grew out of cartoonists' frustration with timid editors - a topic that always comes up in conversation when editorial cartoonists get together. Cartoonists bring their favorite killed cartoons to the AAEC convention and vote for the best spiked cartoon.

The winner of the Golden Spike this year is handsome, young Nate Beeler of the Washington Examiner. That's Nate at the right. Click here to see a movie of Nate discussing his award with me at the AAEC's prestigious and glamorous Golden Spike after-party, honoring Nate's achievement.

Nate's Golden Spike winning cartoon is unusual because it is a sketch and not a finished drawing. I asked Nate to write a few words about his stunning win. See the winning cartoon below.

When I approached my editor with the "Artificial deadlines" cartoon idea, the Walter Reed scandal was raging and troop surge funding was in fierce contention. I was struck by the Catch-22 in which America was caught: Setting deadlines for withdrawal "emboldens" the insurgents, but rising U.S. casualties do, as well. It's a case of "damned if you do, damned if you don't," and I wanted to make people think about both sides of the debate as they formed their own opinions.

My editor explained he wouldn't run the cartoon because he saw it as insensitively using wounded veterans to make a political point. I didn't agree, of course, and after some discussion we still couldn't reconcile our positions. Typically, I submit multiple sketches -- pointing out my favorites -- and we'll come to an agreement on which cartoon I'll draw for the next day. When we don't see eye to eye on my top picks, I'll go to one of the other sketches. It doesn't happen often, but that was one of those days.

-
Nate

Want to compliment Nate or complain about his cartoon? E-mail Nate. And visit Nate's blog for more of his thoughts o this and his other cartoons.


August 5, 2007

Mike Lester's Killed Cartoon

Here's a cartoon (below) that Mike Lester's editor killed, and which we are forbidden to distribute to newspapers, along with Mike's explanation. Here's Mike:

Daryl loves killed cartoons so here's one. A few days ago Elizabeth Edwards made the (should have been more infamous) "tangerine" statement. Because it was only lightly reported, I transcribed the quote in it's entirety for my readers and also to provide validity to the topic.  -Or as the saying goes, "you can't make this **** up".

It was later reported that John Edwards had Christopher Reeve clairvoyantly get out of his wheelchair and walk over a clarification. (No photos available.)

A list of what is NOT produced locally and trucked into Ms. Edwards corner of North Carolina (goods she would therefore eschew given this standard) is exhaustive but good for a laugh: where exactly are those North Carolina diamond mines? And somehow chewing tobacco does not strike me as an Edwards family substitue for pate'. If the global warming nuts and carbon "big foot" prints say, "the debate is over" then why do we continue to read stories like this?

Suffice it to say that the cartoon was killed by my publisher reasoning that is was insensitive to cancer patients. Because the "Big C" rightly evokes great social empathy, I agreed with him. Cancer touches our lives with tragic consequences. But so have auto wrecks, suicide and natural disasters. Physical illness will rightly never be cartoon fodder. Lighting up idiots who swear off tangerines will always be.

Mike Lester


August 5, 2007

Alright! Alright!

OK! You can stop writng! I did it. I gave in. I sent out a CORRECTED, flopped, Barry Bonds cartoon today, with him batting left-handed.

Now, we can all relax again, and get back to our normal lives.


August 3, 2007

More Right Handed Craziness

I'm still getting reaction on the wrong-handed Barry Bonds cartoon. I put together a slideshow for MSNBC.com of Barry Bonds cartoons, and the editor there took my Bonds cartoon out because he didn't like that Bonds was batting right handed. At the same time, the cartoon made the cover of the Humor Times, and I still have readers writing in, pointing out my error. Oh dear.

My excuse now is that I'm dyslexic.


August 1, 2007

Obermeyer on those matching cartoons

Cartoonist Neal Obermeyer wrote an essay on a recent mini-Yahtzee, with me and my buddy, Jeff Koterba of the Omaha World Herald drawing "matching" cartoons.

I've gotten quite a bit of mail about my Barry Bonds cartoon - from readers eager to correct the "mistake" that he is drawn swinging the bat right handed, rather than left handed. Some readers were angry about it, although it is hard for me to see why that would make someone angry, here's an example.

I didn't think much about the left or right handed thing at the time, but that was because the composition called for the asterisk to be on the right, coming at the "end" of the cartoon, reading from left to right. The gag always comes at the end of the cartoon. I couldn't draw Bonds' name on the back of the jersey if he was swinging left handed and still have the asterisk on the right - but Jeff addressed that by having Bonds swing left handed, showing his name on the jersey, and miss, so the asterisk is on the right.

I think the cartoon is more on point if he hits the asterisk though, rather than missing. Is it better that he hit and wrongly be right handed, or miss and correctly be left handed? Now I wonder.

Regarding Jeff's point that he tries not to look at other cartoonists' work - that seems to me to be just the opposite of what a cartoonist should do. We should carefully watch all of our colleagues' work to avoid matching and to force ourselves to develop unique voices.

 

The Bonds that Bind
By Neal Obermeyer


This past April, after the Virginia Tech shootings, some friends and I were discussing the way the media handled the situation. One of those discussions turned to the editorial cartoonists' response, which I have written about here before. Just from Daryl Cagle's cartoon syndicate website, one could find several cartoons changing the "VT" logo into a pistol; several more depicting Uncle Sam mourning; two very similar cartoons with a parent hugging a child who thought his parent would be happy he got in to college; and a few with the Virginia Tech mascot mourning in Uncle Sam's place. (See the Virginia Tech cartoons.)


Friends outside of cartooning were shocked when I assembled a handful of cartoons and exposed the similarities side by side. One told me that it was obvious to him that these cartoonists were copying each other, but I argued that couldn't have been the case when so many of these came out on the same day.

So I opened my copy of the Omaha World-Herald this morning to see Jeff Koterba's cartoon on Barry Bonds. It involved Bonds swinging and missing at a pitched asterisk instead of a baseball. I immediately recalled Daryl Cagle's cartoon of two weeks ago, which depicted Bonds connecting with an asterisk instead of a baseball.


Now in my never-ending quest to be as critical as possible and burn every cartooning bridge before it's assembled, I was tempted to go on one of my customary rants about cartoonist groupthink killing off the industry, blah blah blah, but I thought I'd try something different and turn to the humans behind the cartoons to get their side of the story.

Cagle, the cartoonist for MSNBC.com, wasn't too upset. "It happens," he told me. He often writes about these situations, which he calls a "Yahtzee," on his blog at cagle.com. Cagle's intent with the cartoon was to ask "that we take notice of the 'asterisk' more than the achievement." He thought the cartoon conveyed that concept well, and to him, it appeared Koterba was attempting to deliver the same message.


Koterba's intended message was a little different - an observation that "Bonds would always have that asterisk to contend with." He told me he hadn't seen Cagle's cartoon. "I try to stay away from looking at other cartoons for the very reason that I don't want to be influenced by what other cartoonists are doing," he said. "Coming up with an original idea is a point of pride with me. What's the point of being a cartoonist if you don't have original ideas?"


"When I see that someone else has drawn a cartoon similar to mine, either before or after the fact, I'm mostly disappointed in myself, that I hadn't come up with something beyond the obvious idea that everyone else came up with," Koterba added. "But what happens is that I push myself harder the next time, to try and out-think the other cartoonists."


"On the other hand, it's frustrating to not sometimes do those types of cartoons," he added. "Sometimes it is the obvious idea that resonates with the reader."


As evidence of that, a few days ago I wrote about some of the similarities in the recent Michael Vick cartoons. A quick glance at my site statistics shows that 26 of the past 45 visitors that came here from search engines were looking for Michael Vick cartoons, with several looking specifically for Gary Varvel's cartoon from the Indianapolis Star-News. Cartoonists may judge themselves and each other, but that doesn't change the fact that an audience wants to see these cartoons, even if the same essential idea has been drawn by several people.


Koterba doesn't believe there is any thievery going on in editorial cartooning. "Most cartoonists are competitive and get into this career because they have lot of ideas to share," he said.


But with fewer and fewer staff cartoonist positions, more newspapers are relying on syndicated cartoonists, and those syndicated cartoonists are competing for placement. Other publications, like weekly news magazines, have created their own expectations for what types of cartoons and what style of humor is likely to score reprints.


"There are only so many ideas floating around," Koterba said. "Perhaps if cartoonists looked beyond the headlines more often, this sort of thing would happen less often."


And even though cartoons are often similar, they're rarely identical, and those subtle differences can lead conversations a different direction. When I saw Koterba's cartoon, I immediately thought of Cagle's. But friends I've talked to note the difference between Cagle's hit and Koterba's miss (I'm speaking of the literal depictions in the cartoon, here); the hit suggests the dishonesty of the accomplishment; the miss shows the shame that comes with achieving the milestone without the honor.


Cagle also pointed me to an article in the Penn State Daily Collegian which cited his inaccurate depiction of Bonds - swinging right-handed instead of left - as more evidence of a media tendency to judge Bonds without knowing much about him. To close out this entry, I'll leave you with a question posed by Koterba:


"How is it that Letterman, Conan, and Leno never come up with the same jokes? I mean you would think somewhere along the line, they would have run across this problem. I have a theory that they have a quiet agreement that they share their monologues with each other before show time. What do you think?"

Want to comment on the matching Barry Bonds? E-mail me and Neal Obermeyer.


July 31, 2007

British Yahtzee Grand Slam Sweep

A note from Irish Times cartoonist Martyn Turner;

Dear Daryl,

If you look at the cartoons on the websites of London's four national quality broadsheets; the Guardian, the Times, the Independent and the Daily Telegraph, you will see that their cartoonists have all done exactly the same cartoon - George Bush as death in an Ingmar Bergman film ... never seen that before ...

You have a word for it which escapes me

Best

Martyn

That would be a British Yahtzee Grand Slam Sweep.


July 30, 2007

Spanish Cartoonist Faces Fines

The Spanish prosecutor has decided to pursue the case against El Jueves cartoonist Guillermo and writer Manel Font de Vila, but the prosecutor won't be seeking jail time. The cartoonists face only fines, which will be determined if and when the case goes to court. This report states that the cartoonist and writer are accused of "slandering the Royal Family" ... of-course, they mean "libel," which is written, not "slander," which is spoken ... but I never was very good at Spanish.

Back from Comic Con

The Comic Con was crazy this year, and amazing to see that the whole thing was sold out. I enjoyed my seminars and it was great fun meeting so many fans of our site! I was also delighted that our National Cartoonists Society Foundation auction brought in close to $7,000 for cartoonist college scholarships. Thanks to everyone who participated, and special thanks to Chad Frye, who organized and ran the event, and who outbid me on that Jack Davis piece (that hurt).


July 25, 2007

Spanish Cartoonist Court Appearance

Spanish cartoonist Guillermo and gag writer Manel Font de Vila appeared in Spanish court today and were questioned fo two hours by the judge. The cartoonist and writer denied that they meant to offend the royal family, insisting that they "had simply meant to poke fun at the idea of family aid going to a rich couple that did not need it, not to offend the prince and princess." It is now up to the prosecutor to decide whether to prosecute the case, now that part one of the "inquisition" is over. Spain's attorney General, is quoted as defending the judge's decision to impound the magazine, saying that the cartoon "clearly incurred in a crime." The cartoonist Guillermo and the writer of the cartoon face a prison term of up to two years. See the offending cartoon here.

Cagle at Comic Con

Come see me at the San Diego Comic Con! I'll be giving an hourlong slideshow presentation tomorrow, Thursday; the seminar is called "Spotlight on Daryl Cagle" and I'll talk about my work, my more controversial cartoons, the Best Political Cartoons of the Year, books, this web site, my syndicate - all things Cagle. There will be lots of visuals and lots of time for questions. The seminar is tomorrow (Thursday), July 26th, from 3:00-4:00pm in Room 2.

On Friday July 27th from 1:00 to 2:00pm I'll be signing books and doing drawings at the Cartoon Art Museum's booth. I'll also often be found each day at the National Cartoonists Society (NCS) booth, doing drawings and signing books.

On Saturday, July 28th, from 11:30am-12:30pm in Room 4 I'll be moderating a panel on Political Cartoonists. The panel includes: Steve Breen, the Pulitzer Prize winning cartoonist for the San Diego Union-Tribune; Mr. Fish, the altie cartoonist for the LA Weekly and Village Voice; Patrick O'Connor, the editorial cartoonist for the Los Angeles Daily News; Monte Wolverton, the brilliant editorial cartoonist and Mad Magazine artist, Brian Fairrington, a great cartoonist and my co-editor on the Best Political Cartoons of the Year books; Steve Kelley, the cartoonist for the New Orleans Times-Picayune and Lalo Alcaraz, also an editorial cartoonist for the LA Weekly and creator of the political comic strip, La Cucaracha, which runs in the LA Times.

Right after the editorial cartoonists panel, in the same room, I'll be on a NCS panel; this one is Saturday, July 28th, from 12:30-1:30pm, also in Room 4. The panel discussion includes me, Lalo Alcaraz, Steve Breen and Steve Kelley from the previous panel. New to this panel will be Andrew Feinstein ("Girls & Sports"/Creators Syndicate) and Michael Jantze ("The Norm"/TheNorm.com). The emphasis of this panel will be on comic strips, the NCS and general newspaper cartooning.


Throughout the convention at the National Cartoonists Society booth we'll be conducting a silent auction of original cartoon artwork donated by famous cartoonists to benefit the National Cartoonists Society Foundation's scholarship programs for college cartoonists. Read more about the scholarships here. This is a great opportunity to pick up a bargain masterpiece. Some of the artwork to be auctioned is shown below: The cartoon at the right is by Tom Richmond of Mad Magazine.

The Family Circus cartoon below is by Jeff and Bil Keane.






Baby Blues by Jerry Scott and Rick Kirkman



Mutts by Patrick McDonnell



Beetle Baily by Mort Walker



Doonesbury by Garry Trudeau



Chad Frye of the Walt Disney Company and C.F. Payne, the famous illustrator.



Eric Goldberg, the animator of the Genie in Aladdin.



Mad Magazine's Jack Davis


These originals and many others are all for sale and all proceeds go to the National Cartoonists Society Foundation to fund our scholarships! Come, pick up your own cartoon masterpiece!


July 24, 2007

More on El Jueves Tomorrow

El Jueves cartoonist Guillermo and a writer for the magazine, Manel Font de Vila, who apparently wrote the gag for the banned magazine cover, have been summoned to appear in Spanish National Court tomorrow (Wednesday). They will be questioned by a substitute prosecutor in the case, as the regular prosecutor is on vacation.


July 23, 2007

The El Jueves Web Site is Back Up

The El Jueves web site is back online today, but without the offending cartoon cover that was blocked by a court order (below). The site shows what looks like the next issue of the magazine, with Crown Prince Felipe as a bee, and his wife as a flower. The headline reads: "CORRECTION! This is the cover we actually wanted to publish." Oh, those sexy royals!

July 22, 2007

I decided to write a column on the Spanish cartoon brouhaha and I've deleted the previous entries on the subject. Thanks again to Jose Beltran-Escavy who put me on to the under-reported story and gave me some great background and translations.

No One Expects The Cartoon Inquisition

The Spanish humor magazine, El Jueves, published a cartoon on July 18th that was too much for a Spanish court to stomach. Two days after the magazine came out, a judge ordered police to remove all copies of El Jueves from newsstands and kiosks, the magazine's web site was taken down and the court is seeking more information on the cartoonist, who faces a possible two year jail term.

Soon after the judge's ruling, the cartoon started appearing all over the web and was published in other Spanish newspapers as a news story. The internet buzz was so big that the magazines were often sold out when police arrived at newsstands the next day, to confiscate them. Now the cartoon is a phenomenon, having been seen by many millions of people around he world, rather than just the 80,000 readers of El Jueves. Judges should be careful about what they ask for.

The offending cartoon on the cover of the magazine shows Spanish Crown Prince Felipe having "doggie style" sex with his wife, Letizia, under the headline, "Obviously Elections are Coming, ZP!" ("ZP" is short for Spanish Prime Minister Zapatero); "2,500 Euros per Child" appears in large red type is above the head of the crown prince, who says to his wife, "Do you realize? If you get pregnant this will be the closest thing to work I will have ever done in my life!" The headline lampoons a recent initiative by the Spanish government, which would give financial help to couples who have children, in the amount of 2,500 euros or about $3450.00 per child.

Spanish judge Juan Del Olmo wrote that the cartoon was "a clearly denigrating act which is objectively defamatory." It "is a caricature that affects the honor and the intimate nucleus of dignity of the persons represented by it," Del Olmo said. "It could damage the prestige of the Crown."

On their web site, for a few hours before the site was taken down, the editors of El Jueves made this statement, "We are cartoonists, and we are aware that our work, our duty, and what our readers expect from us is for us to explore the limits of our freedom of expression. We understand that, from time to time, we can even exceed them. That's life. If we exceed them, that's what courts are for. But... taking the magazine away? The police going from shop to shop all over the country taking away our magazine? Are we really writing this on July 20th, 2007?"

Part of the judge's ruling was a demand to find out the identity of the cartoonist, who goes by the single name, "Guillermo." It is common for cartoonists around the world to use one name, a charming conceit that American cartoonists rarely take advantage of - our celebrities have discovered it though, and it works well for Cher, Madonna, Lassie and Flipper. Guillermo's full name is Guillermo Torres Meana; he also draws for the Spanish newspaper El Mundo.

In another part of his ruling, the judge demanded that the magazine surrender the "printing plates" that contain the offending cartoon. The judge clearly wasn't aware that printing plates are not used in modern printing. Guillermo is reported to have said: "They're going to take the printing plates? Why those haven't existed for years! The best thing would be for them to cut off my right hand."

The Royal family issued a statement saying that they didn't ask for the ban. All but one major Spanish newspaper condemned the ban. Al Jazeera showed the cover of the magazine with the racy royals obscured by a black haze. Guillermo's newspaper, El Mundo, in an editorial commented that the cartoon was "within what is permissible in a society where freedom of expression is a fundamental value."

The Crown Prince and his divorcee, TV newswoman wife have increasingly become the butt of jokes in Spain. El Jueves published a 350 page book of cartoons making fun of the royal family titled, "Tocando los Borbones," which is a play on the royals' surname meaning "to be obnoxious," or that the royal family is obnoxious and the authors will be obnoxious toward them. It may be that the judge doesn't get out much.

The cartoon kerfuffle in Spain seems more outrageous because it is happening in a modern, EU country where freedom of the press is broadly accepted, but such bans were more common 20 years ago and happened frequently under Spain's General Franco. In fact, cartoons are one of the best barometers of the freedom of a society; in totalitarian countries cartoonists never think of lampooning their nation's leaders. Cuban cartoonists never draw Castro. Chinese cartoonists don't draw their leaders. Don't even think of drawing the Prophet Muhammad.

When countries teeter on the edge of political freedom the people who test the limits are cartoonists. In recent years: Algerian cartoonist Ali Dilem has been fined and sentenced to jail for drawing his nation's leaders; South African cartoonist Jonathan "Zapiro" Shapiro is being sued for millions of dollars by an insulted politician; cartoonist Essam Hanafy was jailed in Egypt for insulting the deputy Prime Minister; cartoonist Paul "Popoli" Nyemb of Cameroon was chased down by goon squads from the government he ridiculed; cartoonist Musa Kart was sued by the Prime Minister of Turkey who was insulted by being drawn as a cat. There are many more.

Nations, and judges, are best judged by their tolerance of cartoons.


July 19, 2007

Here is an excellent column by Arizona Daily Star cartoonist, David Fitzsimmons. E-mail David. See an archive of David's cartoons here.

Star's editorial cartoonist makes his case for his craft and for his dwindling peers
By David Fitzsimmons
Arizona Daily Star, Tucson, Arizona | Published: 07.15.2007

The American Association of Editorial Cartoonists is so old it qualifies for the AARP. A number of newspapers, however, are retiring their cartoonists.

Celebrating its 50th year, the cartoonists association works to keep its members from going the way of the gargoyle carver and the dodo wrangler. The ferruginous pygmy owl of the newsroom, the American cartoonist is a cranky and endangered critter.

A century ago America's papers fielded nearly 2,000 cartoonists. Today there are fewer than 80 staff cartoonists interpreting events, zinging their targets, challenging the perspectives of their readers and making their editors uneasy.

Few journalists can skewer with the entertaining unfairness of these First Amendment cage-rattlers. Searing visual satire is as American as an apple pie in the face.

Cartoonists, right and left, are being erased from newsroom budgets. Kenneling and feeding a rabid local cartoonist seems like a poor bargain when benign drawings scrawled in distant newsrooms about distant topics are available for peanuts.

Therein lies the value of the local cartoon. Occupying a space the size of a Pop-Tart on our nation's opinion pages, the hometown cartoon is a unique local voice addressing issues.

The New York Times has no staff editorial cartoonist because it views cartoons as a grotesque, low art form that oversimplifies and distorts the truth to convey an opinion.

Bingo! A sharp, unforgettable cartoon does all that in an instant.

A cartoon doesn't bother to carefully prosecute the accused with arguments. That is the realm of the editorial writer. A good cartoon condemns and executes on the spot.

Evoking a quick and intense reaction with an extreme and often absurd image, the cartoonist traffics in a unique persuasive art.

In my lifetime, cartooning has evolved from the gray, indignant era of Herblock's (Herbert Block) Mister Atom Bomb and John Q. Public to the burlesque style of my generation, pioneered by Pat Oliphant and Jeff MacNelly. Mike Luckovich and Mike Peters are the current masters of this form.

In this age of war and terror, cartoons have grown darker and pungent.

The cartoonist whispers in the ears of polyester Gods that they are mortal and don't look now, buddy, but your fly is down. The big fish that reign in our little ponds need the satirist's harpoon to remind them that they swim among us, not above us.

The Star values publishing a local cartoonist. As our publisher and editor, John M. Humenik, says, the Star's mission is to be our community's best friend and most constructive critic.

The editorial cartoonist is the friend down at the local coffee shop who isn't afraid to be open and honest because he cares about his neck of the woods. He's the wiseguy who ribs the local yokels and happily takes the heat.

When Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist Doug Marlette died on Tuesday, in a auto accident in Mississippi, I thought of the courageous and funny cartoons he drew for the Charlotte Observer about a local issue that had not yet become a national story.

His cartoons about Jim and Tammy Faye Bakker's mismanaged PTL Club hit the local Goliath between the eyes every time. The marketing and advertising departments and nervous editors undoubtedly cringed. His cartoons served not merely a city and a newspaper, but a greater cause. His cartoons were the epitome of good local opinion journalism.

A local editorial cartoon is one of the things that makes the Star unique to the community we serve, and it encourages our readers to consider events and issues from a different - hopefully, an entertaining and humorous - point of view.

Your Comments:

Dear Mr. Fitzsimmons,

I enjoyed your column (referenced above) immensely. I particularly liked the below quotes as they highlight the NYT's - and all the national MSM - delusions of grandeur about themselves while pointing out their failures and what they have become.
"The New York Times has no staff editorial cartoonist because it views cartoons as a grotesque, low art form that oversimplifies and distorts the truth to convey an opinion."
"The cartoonist whispers in the ears of polyester Gods that they are mortal and don't look now, buddy, but your fly is down. The big fish that reign in our little ponds need the satirist's harpoon to remind them that they swim among us, not above us."

"The Star values publishing a local cartoonist. As our publisher and editor, John M. Humenik, says, the Star's mission is to be our community's best friend and most constructive critic."
The irony of the NYT, the paper who beat the twin drums of lies and propaganda to support going to war, criticizing anyone for oversimplifying and distorting the truth is mind boggling. But then, they has plenty of help from all the major national news outlets. Their flies are all down too but they still refuse to look and zip.
Thanks for continuing to rattle the cage.

Sincerely,
Jean Waller
Sherman Oaks, CA


Re: Fitzsimmons Best Ever Cartoon. He showed Bush and Putin with Bush saying "I looked into his eyes and saw his soul,"
and Putin thinking, "I looked into his ear and saw the other side." Ask him for it.

Bill Cozine, Tucson, AZ


Well said...bravo!
Arthur Gladstone, Lauderhill FL
Good column ...regarding the demise of cartoonists, so indicative of our dark and increasingly ignorant times

I love the political cartoons, perhaps because I just can't help my own "mind flash" of
a daily news cartoon possibility (which seldom sees the light of day of course)
but l love seeing what the REAL cartoonists actually do create and get published.
I've been filling a notebook with my favorite political cartoons to put in my guest bedroom.
:D:D
Needless to say, it's full of BUSH stuff. I don't allow Republicans to visit, so no worry about offending.
No, just kidding. Sort of.
Judy Gosnell, Grants Pass, OR


July 14, 2007

Daryl,

Regarding the man who took issue with your writing of Allah, does he take issue with Western Muslims who constantly use the term "Allah" while speaking.in English? He is correct that the word simply means "god" but the claim by religious moderates that everyone worships the same god is a weak attempt to insulate religion from critical thought and pretend religious texts aren't completely contradictory. Only the most cruel god would create multiple religions with different morals and laws to pit factions of humanity against each other. When you use the word "Allah" it refers specifically to the cruel misogynist hate-filled god from the Koran and the term "God" usually refers to the cruel misogynist vengeful dictator of the Bible, so I think it is fair to make a distinction so readers know which myth you are referencing.

Matt Bors

 

Hi Matt,

Of-course, I agree.

I wasn't translating what the crazy, fundamentalist, terrorist Muslim was saying in my cartoon, I was quoting my fictional character exactly; he was speaking in English; he used the term "Allah" just, as you point out, the English speaking Muslim experts on TV do.

And, as we all know, when speaking to a French waiter in English, you have to speak loudly for them to understand.

Best,
Daryl

 

July 13, 2007

More from Last Week's AAEC Convention ... Offending Musllims

Mike Thompson was on the same panel with Flemming Rose, talking about how Cartoonists from the Muslim world and American cartoonists draw each other. Mike asked some prominent Muslim leaders from the Detroit area to look over my web site and select the cartoons that they thought were most offensive to Muslims; among their choices was the cartoon that I drew, below. The cartoon was drawn right after 9/11, when there was news that the U.S. Government had frozen the bank accounts of many radical Muslims and organizations who were suspected of having some connection to terrorism. My drawing makes fun of some random terrorist who, I imagined, got stuck with his bill at a restaurant when his bank account was frozen ­ but it wasn't the drawing that was considered offensive - it was my use of the word, "Allah."

The Muslim leaders complained that American cartoonists "translate" what the Muslim characters in their cartoons are saying, except for the word "Allah." To be consistent, they argue, I should have used the word "God" instead of "Allah," and by using the word "Allah" I was somehow saying that Muslims have a different god ("Allah") than the Christian god ("God"), when "we have the same God." That bugs them because, as they see it, Christians (they assume American cartoonists are Christians) using the word "Allah" are referring to a different, Muslim "God" who is somehow seen as inferior to the Christian God.

If I got that wrong, I'm sure someone will correct me.

Here's an interesting piece, courtesy of Editor & Publisher:

In TV Spot, Illinois Newspaper Brags About Cartoonist It Laid Off

By E&P Staff
Published: July 13, 2007 11:00 AM ET

NEW YORK An Illinois newspaper ran a TV ad touting an award won by an editorial cartoonist it laid off last October, according to a Friday piece in the Chicago Reader.

The paper is the Crystal Lake Northwest Herald, and the cartoonist is Scott Nychay -- who worked for the daily eight years before being let go.

Michael Miner of the Reader wrote that the ad was a 15-second spot running early in the morning on WBBM-TV, the Northwest Herald's "news partner." The spot said: "More than 60 awards in 2005, including: best-overall newspaper, AP top-ten sports section, and Fischetti editorial-cartoonist honor. ..." Nychay's "Intelligent Design" cartoon, which tied for second in the Fischetti contest, appeared briefly in the Northwest Herald ad.

Northwest Herald Editor Chris Krug told Miner the ad was created in 2005, and an updated version began airing last July. "This was clearly an oversight on our part and not an attempt to gain ground through the work of a former employee," Krug said, adding that the TV spot has been pulled ...

Andy Schotz, chair of the Society of Profressional Journalists' ethics committee, told Miner in a statement: "The paper only flashed Nychay's work briefly on the screen and didn't show or mention him specifically, so maybe there was some thought about being sensitive. But proudly trumpeting the excellent work of someone whose job you recently eliminated takes nerve. ..."

Schotz added: "It's a shame that the editorial cartoonist is often the first to go when a newspaper makes cuts. How amazing it is that in an era of quick-hit short stories and graphics to accommodate short attention spans, newspapers chop out editorial cartoons -- unique, visual stories, with instant, powerful messages." ...

Nychay was laid off despite winning several other cartooning awards besides the Fischetti one, publishing two books of work, and raising about $50,000 for Hurricane Katrina and tsunami victims via cartoon reprints purchased by readers.


July 11, 2007

This cartoon was drawn by Andy Marlette, who is Doug's talented nephew. We share in Andy's grief.

July 10, 2007

DOUG MARLETTE KILLED IN CAR WRECK

I'm sad to report that the Pulitzer Prize winning cartoonist for the Tulsa World, Doug Marlette, died today in a single car accident in Mississippi. Read an article on the Charlotte Observer site. Doug was formerly the cartoonist for the Observer, the Tallahassee Democrat, New York Newsday and the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Doug was 57. That's Doug's last cartoon, below. Click here to see a TV news clip from the Tulsa station KOTV.


Doug Marlette, Tulsa World, OK
E-mail Doug. Visit Doug's site. Visit an archive of the artist's most recent cartoons in the drop menu at the right. Click on the cartoon to e-mail it to a friend. To request a reprint of this comic go to www.tmsreprints.com.