http://list.cagle.com
 
Blogs Etc. Travel Weather Health Tech/Science Entertainment Sports Business World News Politics U.S. news Home

















2007 in Review
2006 in Review
2005 in Review
2004 in Review

2002 in Review

Our Cartoons for YOU

Cagle Privacy Policy

Daryl Cagle's Cartoon Web Log!
CURRENT - MAY/AUG'08 - JAN/APRIL'08 - SEP/OCT/NOV/DEC'07 - JULY/AUG'07 - MAY/JUNE'07 - MAR/APR'07 - JAN/FEB'07 - NOV/DEC'06 - SEPT/OCT'06 - JULY/AUG'06 - JUNE'06 - APR/MAY'06 - MAR'06 - FEB'06 - JAN'06- DEC'05 - NOV'05 - OCT''05 - SEPT''05 - JULY-AUG'05 - JUNE''05 - MAY'05 - FEB'05 - APR'05 - MAR'05 - FEB'05 - DEC'04/JAN'05 - NOV'04 - SEP/OCT'04 - AUGUST'04 - JULY'04 - JUNE'04 - MAY'04 - APR'04 - MAR''04 -FEB'04 - JAN''04 - DEC'03 - NOV''03 - OCT'03- SEPT'03- AUG'03 - JULY'03

December 28, 2007

Check out my own 2007 Year in Review Slideshow from MSNBC.com.


December 26, 2007

New cartoonist!

I'm pleased to announce that we've added a new cartoonist to our site, Drew Litton, the sports cartoonist for the Rocky Mountain News in Denver, Colorado. Fifty years ago, sports cartoonists were common at major daily newspapers - now I can think of only one other full time sports cartoonist, Bill Gallo, at the New York Daily News.

The Rocky Mountain News also has a full time editorial cartoonist, Ed Stein, making it one of only a handful of papers with two cartoonists on staff. That is one of Drew Litton's cartoons below. See Drew's new archive of cartoons here.


December 19, 2007

Here is an interesting interview with former Mormon cartoonist, Steve Benson, from Editors & Publisher's Dave Astor, posted here with permission.

Ex-Mormon Cartoonist Says Romney Not Telling Truth
By Dave Astor Published: December 18, 2007 3:50 PM ET

NEW YORK As an ex-Mormon, Arizona Republic editorial cartoonist Steve Benson has strong opinions about current Mormon Mitt Romney. He said the Republican candidate's recent speech on religion should not be trusted by media people and other Americans.

In his talk, Romney said "I believe in my Mormon faith" while also noting that the church's "teachings" would not influence his decisions if elected president.

"Yeah, right," responded Benson, adding that "Romney also believes in misrepresenting what his Mormon Church actually espouses."

Benson is the grandson of former Mormon leader Ezra Taft Benson.

He told E&P that, in his view, a Mormon believer is required by church doctrine (as dictated by the church's "living prophet") to "obey God's commands" over anything else. He said "Romney, like all 'temple Mormons,' made his secret vows using Masonic-derived handshakes, passwords, and symbolic death oaths that he promised in the temple never to reveal to the outside world" -- and that Romney also secretly vowed to devote his "time, talents" and more "to the building of the Mormon religion on earth."

So, said Benson, the only way Romney could be truly independent of the church as U.S. president would be to disavow Mormon doctrine. "He hasn't done that," said the Creators Syndicate-distributed cartoonist.

"When Mitt says he belongs to a church that doesn't tell him what to do, that's false; it's a 24/7, do-what-you're-told-to-do church," asserted Benson, who won the Pulitzer Prize for editorial cartooning in 1993.

That was the year Benson left what he calls the "Mormon cult." One reason for his decision was disgust with the way Mormon officials tried to fool church members and the general public into believing that Ezra Taft Benson -- Steve's then-94-year-old grandfather and church president -- was still capable of leading the church. "He was not mentally or physically in a place where he could make any meaningful decisions," recalled Benson. "I know it because I saw his condition with my own eyes."

Benson -- who was contacted by E&P for this story -- said journalists have basically given Romney a free pass on the "fundamental contradiction" between being an observant Mormon and a U.S. president. "Most journalists don't know about actual Mormon teachings and practices," noted the cartoonist, adding that they instead see the religion as perhaps "strange" but "rather benign."

Romney "needs to face an informed member of the media with 'cojones' who has a working and perhaps personal experience with Mormonism," said Benson. "It would be harder for Romney to do his well-practiced duck and dodge."

Benson himself drew a post-Romney speech cartoon that pictured John F. Kennedy saying "Ask not what your country can do for you..." followed by Romney saying "...do whatever it takes for me to win Iowa." (Many people believe Romney gave what he hoped would be a JFK-like speech on religion because he was losing support in Iowa.) But Benson said he hasn't heavily focused on Romney's Mormonism in other cartoons. "Religious issues are very touchy," he said. "I do what I can, but I pick my battles."

Another reason Benson distrusts the words in Romney's speech is because the candidate has changed his public positions on issues such as abortion and gay rights to woo conservative GOP voters in states like Iowa rather than the more liberal voters he once courted to become governor of Massachusetts. "He flips and flops like Jesus is coming tomorrow," said the cartoonist. "It's like Romney is reading from the Mormon Church playbook."

Benson explained his last comment by noting that the Mormon Church has also "publicly flipped 180 degrees when it feels it's necessary for its image, for its financial solvency, and for political expediency."

He mentioned, by way of example, that black Mormons weren't allowed into the priesthood until 1978. And while polygamy has been publicly disavowed by the Mormon Church, Benson said "the church still holds that it will be practiced as a matter of eternal doctrine in heaven. The church also currently performs polygamist marriage 'sealings' in its temples around the world."

Benson predicted that Romney will not win the Republican presidential nomination. If Romney is nominated, added the cartoonist, he will not defeat his Democratic opponent.

Voters, said Benson, "are not ready for someone in the Oval Office who has committed to absolute obedience to a religion they feel is extremely odd and not in the American mainstream. I trust the rational U.S. electorate, not the weird Mormon God."

Want to comment? E-mail us.


December 10, 2007

From Vince O'Farrell:

G'day Daryl,

I went to Kemsley's funeral yesterday. Cartoonists and politicians and actors and friends from all over Australia came to give James a fine send off. There was a lot of laughter and bad jokes and many people pointing out James' lack of ability with a cricket bat, cricket being a sport very close to his heart. He was a fanatic. Fittingly his send off was at Bradman Oval, home to the Sir Donald Bradman Museum. Sir Donald Bradman was Australia's and the world's greatest ever cricketer. James was one of the driving forces behind the establishment of the Museum. People now come from all over the cricket playing world to see the fruits of his labour.

Kems was a good mate and a top bloke. He will be missed.

Cheers mate. Have a Merry Christmas,

Vince


December 5, 2007

The Jay Kennedy Memorial Scholarship - COLLEGE STUDENTS APPLY NOW!

I'd like to encourage all aspiring college cartoonists to apply for our National Cartoonists Society Foundation (NCSF), Jay Kennedy Memorial Scholarship. It is new this year, the winner will get a healthy (though as yet undisclosed) multi-thousand dollar scholarship along with a trip to the National Cartoonists Society's annual Reuben Awards convention where he/she will have an opportunity to meet his/her cartoonist heroes and receive the award on stage with the other cartoonist award winners.

King Features Syndicate established the award with a $100,000 donation, honoring their beloved comics editor, Jay Kennedy. Jay was a friend to everyone in our little profession and was known for finding and nurturing new cartooning talent - so a scholarship in his name is a fitting tribute.

When I'm not drawing, or running around with webby chores, I also pitch in as president of the National Cartoonists Society Foundation and I worked with King Features in setting this up. The guy in charge is our NCSF Education Committee Chairman, cartoonist John Kovaleski, who is organizing a jury of top cartoonists to judge the entries. Here are the rules:

Applicants must be college students in the United States, Canada or Mexico who will be attending college as juniors or seniors during the 2008-2009 academic year. Applicants DO NOT have to be art majors to be eligible for this scholarship.

Along with a completed entry form, applicants are required to send 5 samples of their own cartooning artwork; noting if and where the work has been published (either print or web).

Please send copies.
DO NOT send original artwork.
DEADLINE: JANUARY 31, 2008

The applications will be judged by the National Cartoonists Society Foundation (NCSF) and the number of scholarships given out and their amounts will be at their discretion of the NCSF.
Please send your completed form and your cartooning artwork (copies only) to:

THE JAY KENNEDY MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP
National Cartoonists Society Foundation
341 N. Maitland Avenue, Suite 130
Maitland, FL 32751

I would encourage college cartoonists who will not be in their junior or senior year in 2008-2009 to apply anyway, because the NCSF may award additional scholarships, at their discretion. Every aspiring college cartoonist should take advantage of this opportunity. Click here to download the entry form. Have any questions? E-mail John Kovaleski at john@kovaleski.com.

Apply! Do it now!


December 4, 2007

Rainer Hachfeld

German cartoonist Rainer Hachfeld often makes readers of our site angry. His early, insulting drawings of president Bush made many of our Republican readers hopping mad a few years ago - now those Republican readers have grown numb to the visual insults, but Rainer is still pushing our buttons and stirring the web 'toon pot. He loves to abuse Condi Rice. Rainer has a unique look and his ugly underside is so truly mean, that he makes me laugh every time.

Rainer sent us an outline of his creative process. Want to send a comment to Rainer? E-mail him here. Comment on Rainer's cartoon below. I'll hand it over to Rainer:

This is my creative process: I inform myself reading the morning papers and looking in some online news.
I choose either the most important or the most ridiculous news, get an idea and draw.

I enjoy caricaturing George W Bush. He is one of the most ridiculous politicians in my repertoire. The policies he stands for are criminal and dangerous. But that does not change his ridiculousness, other politicians espouse the same policies. He only has to put them across, which causes  him difficulties, because he doesn't  really understand them. I like to draw Bush in relation to Condoleeza Rice as a helpless toddler. His Secretary of State is his superior in intellect and other aspects also. He follows her lead and cries on her shoulder.

Step 1:
I draw a more or less hastily pencil sketch in a certain frame, because the daily newspaper for which I work the most asks for a particular format.



Step 2:
On this sketch I draw the cartoon in thin lines with a Rotring rapidograph 0, 35 mm, rub out the pencil (not very painstaking).



Step 3:
I paint over the thin lines with a Japanese brush fountain pen. I stick in the writings (if there are any) which I printed before on my Mac. Software: QarkXPress, type (for the balloons) Comic Sans MS, or software TypeStyler (which is bad because they still haven't released a program for Mac OS X).




Step 4:
The cartoon is now in my scanner CanoScan N65OU. I adapt it in Adobe Photoshop CS. I clean the drawing (now very careful), fill in the black areas, extinguish the frame. I make the cartoon ready for dispatch as e-mail attachment (JPEG, 400 dpi).



Final step 5:
If there are writings in a cartoon I extinguish the German text an put in the English version for my international customers.

Click here to comment on Rainer's Bush-Dove cartoon (above).



December 4, 2007

James Kemsley Passes

I was saddened to learn that my dear friend, cartoonist James Kemsley has died. James drew the popular Australian comic strip "Ginger Meggs;" a sample of the strip is below. Jason Chatfield, the young cartoonist who will take over Ginger Meggs, has a tribute to Kems up on his site here. The photo shows (from left) Peter Broelman, James Kemsley, Michael Ramirez and me at Universal Studios.

Kems was a wonderful guy and friend to cartoonists all over the world. It is hard to believe that he is gone.

This is the announcement from Australian Cartoonists' Association president, Peter Broelman:

It is with a heavy heart that I announce the passing of James Kemsley on Monday Dec 3, 2007.
 
James touched the lives of many cartoonists, both in Australia and abroad, during his illustrious career. James began drawing the iconic Ginger Meggs in 1984 and built on its success both in Australia and overseas. He served as President of the Australian Black and White Artists Club and later the Australian Cartoonists' Association. When he wasn't in an official role his guidance and assistance continued spanning over 20 years. In 1990 he was awarded the Jim Russell Award for oustanding contribution to Australian cartooning, two Stanleys for Comic Strip Artist (1990 and 2004) and the Gold Stanley for Cartoonist Of The Year in 2001.
 
Privately he helped many cartoonists find their way through the maze that is freelance cartooning. Many will be indebted for his enthusiasm and guidance. Cartoonist, actor, entertainer, cricket tragic and keen St. Kilda supporter James led the charge for the ACA culminating in the association being recognised with a Walkley Award for Most Outstanding Contribution to Journalism in 2005.

Our thoughts and prayers go to his family, Helen, Jed, Hywel and Sebastian.
 
He will be sorely missed.
 
RIP James and thank you.
 
Peter Broelman
President
Australian Cartoonists' Association
www.cartoonists.org.au


November 9, 2007

MORE INTERESTING STATS

We have a great new system that allows our readers to subscribe to any cartoonist on the site and receive an e-mail with that cartoonist's most recent cartoon, whenever we post a new cartoon from each cartoonist. It has been running for about three months now - that is what the Cagle Eagle is hawking over in the column on the left. Take a look, it is pretty cool. Subscribe to as many as you want, it is FREE.

I just got stats on the individual artist newsletters for the first time and I was a bit surprised to see who the most popular cartoonists are with our reader/subscribers. Here is the top ten list, with the most popular first (I blush):

1. Daryl Cagle
2. Pat Bagley
3. Eric Allie
4. Monte Wolverton
5. Matt Bors
6. Andy Singer
7. Brian Fairrington
8. Shannon Wheeler
9. Clay Bennett
10. Jen Sorensen

I thought that list was interesting - five liberal "altie cartoonists," an arch conservative and two non-alties on the left. The only trend I see is that these artists are mostly liberal, with very strong individual styles and points of view. I shouldn't be surprised that they have loyal fans.

Take a look below at cartoonists number 2, 3 and 4. Pat Bagley and Monte Wolverton are Bush bashers who are strongly against the war in Iraq. Eric Allie is a loyal Bushie and supporter of the war in Iraq. Here are three examples of recent Iraq cartoons from each:


By Pat Bagley. Click here to comment on this cartoon.



By Eric Allie. Click here to comment on this cartoon.


By Monte Wolverton. Click here to comment on this cartoon.


November 8, 2007

Wow! So many interesting comments on Mr. Fish's Imaginary Jesus Friend cartoon. Come take a look.

WRITERS STRIKE YAHTZEE!

I'd write something about the writer's Strike, but my mind has gone blank! Click to see our new collection of cartoons on the Writers Strike.


Bob Englehart



Guy Badeaux


John Darkow


Jerry Holbert


Mike Keefe


Henry Payne


Bill Schorr


Dana Summers


November 7, 2007


That Mr. Fish Cartoon ­ YIPES!

Every so often I like to post a controversial cartoon here and see what kind of reaction the readers have. Since the cartoonists on our site all draw for mainstream newspapers I very rarely see cartoons that are so outrageous that I feel compelled to take a cartoon down - that said, much of our e-mail comes from readers who are outraged by one cartoon or another and demand that I take a cartoon down. If I respond, it is to say that we exist to offend.

Cartoonist Dwayne "Mr. Fish" Booth comes from a different place. His cartoons appear in the alternative weeklies The Los Angeles Free Press and The Village Voice in New York, where his readers are rather more tolerant of Mr. Fish's tone. On our site, surrounded by mainstream cartoonists, Mr. Fish is the spice in the Fish stew.

When I received Mr. Fish's cartoon yesterday I knew it would generate some reader reaction, so I decided to ask Dwayne some questions about it and post his responses for discussion. If any of our readers would like to comment on the cartoon below, or would like to comment on Mr. Fish's responses to my questions, please click here. This is what I wrote to Mr. Fish:

1) Did you expect offend a bunch of people with this cartoon?

2) When you do really provocative cartoons like this, the audience in the Los Angeles Free Press and the Village Voice is less likely to be offended than a more typical cross-section of America audience - maybe like the audience on our site. You know you don't get mainstream papers running cartoons like this, right?

3) Tell me about the angry e-mail.

4) Is Jesus a bad guy too?

Read the response below the cartoon and COMMENT.
1) Did you expect to offend a bunch of people with this cartoon?

Not with this one, no. I think that it's pretty clear that Bush is the target of my ridicule, not Jesus, whose approval rating is considerably higher than the President's. In fact, the fact that I specify in the gag line that it is Bush's imaginary Savior might help to deflect any criticism that attempts to say that I am mocking Christianity as it exists outside of George W's head. It is actually a cartoon about what the absence of Christ's most basic moral teachings looks like, not the other way around.

2) When you do really provocative cartoons like this, the audience in the Los Angeles Free Press and the Village Voice is less likely to be offended than a more typical cross-section of America audience - maybe like the audience on our site. You know you don't get mainstream papers running cartoons like this, right?

Right, which is why, I believe that images such as mine are often misinterpreted and seen as political or religious debasements rather than as well-intentioned attempts to seek out the ideas muted by patriotic or religious symbolism. Advertisers, who provide the overwhelming bulk of funding for the mainstream, assume that dissent and rigorous debate over controversial issues is a deterrent to the selling of feel-good products - and they're right. Sometimes the feel-good product is our own hubris. More nay saying allowed into the mainstream might've prevented the invasion of Iraq rather than the lesser prize of preventing another Republican presidency.

3) Tell me about the angry e-mail.

They come regularly and I answer every single one. I typically find that I can eventually develop a dialogue with my non-fans, converting some to fans even, because they generally blow all their anger in the first volley and are left with a frustration that they're all too happy to have dissipated through conversation. People are generally civil with each other when forced to quantify their vilification of another person, as there are very few real villains in the world capable of matching the ridicule they invite.

4) Is Jesus a bad guy too?

Jesus is whoever a storyteller intends him to be, regardless of whether you believe he existed or not, because all that we have of him - given the fact that he was either born or invented over 2000 years ago - are other people's interpretations, followed by our own interpretations of their interpretations. Hitler's Jesus, for example, is different from Dr. Martin Luther King's. In fact, the very radical notion presented by the origins of Christianity, namely that the underprivileged have legitimate human value, is a hippie concept I believe to be much further to the left of anything that most liberal Democrats would want to support financially or to throw public policy behind. In that way, my championing of the victims in most everything that I cartoon aligns me much more with Jesus Christ than anyone claiming to be his critic.

Comment here!


November 4, 2007

Clay Bennett Wins the Job in Chattanooga

Clay Bennett, a long time contributor to our site and a Pulitzer Prize winner, will be moving from his current job at the Christian Science Monitor, to take over the editorial cartooning spot at the Chattanooga Times-Free Press, left vacant when Bruce Plante moved to the Tulsa World, to fill the spot left open with the tragic death of Doug Marlette.

Congratulations to Clay on his move!

Here's an article on the move, courtesy of Editor & Publisher

UPDATE: 'CSM' Cartoonist Clay Bennett Talks to E&P About His Move to Chattanooga Paper

By Dave Astor

Published: November 05, 2007 1:00 PM ET

NEW YORK Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist Clay Bennett is leaving The Christian Science Monitor to join The Chattanooga (Tenn.) Times Free Press for several reasons.

"I've had a hankering to get back to a metro paper," said Bennett, who joins the Times Free Press on Jan. 1 -- exactly 10 years to the day he started at the Monitor. "There's something to having a real constituency you can see."

This also means a number of Bennett's Times Free Press cartoons will be local, which he looks forward to. "Local cartoons give readers what they can't get anywhere else," said Bennett, who mostly did national and international commentary for the Monitor -- and will continue to do those kinds of cartoons for the Times Free Press along with local ones.

Bennett will replace Bruce Plante, who recently left the Times Free Press for the Tulsa (Okla.) World.

The Monitor cartoonist told E&P that he heard good things about the Times Free Press from Plante, including praise about the "latitude" the paper allows its cartoonist. And given that the paper has two editorial pages (one liberal and one conservative), it would be difficult to "go outside what the newspaper professes" in its opinions, Bennett said wryly.

"My political leanings are more liberal than not, but a lot of cartoons I do don't take a partisan position," he said.

Bennett, 49, is also looking forward to working in Chattanooga, a city he has known and loved since he was a teen. Indeed, it will be a return to the south for Bennett, who worked for newspapers such as the St. Petersburg (Fla.) Times. And the South Carolina native went to high school and college in two Alabama towns along the Tennessee River, which Chattanooga also borders.

"I'm starting to feel a bit like Huck Finn," he quipped, adding: "I've always had this emotionally conflicted relationship with the South, but I can't deny the influence it's had on my life."

Bennett joined the Boston-based Monitor in 1998 -- four years before winning the Pulitzer. Bennett said he'll always be grateful to the Monitor for hiring him, because he spent three years unable to find a staff cartooning job after being let go by the St. Petersburg Times.

"The Monitor took a chance on me when no one else seemed to want to," he said. "So leaving is a bittersweet decision for me."

Bennett said he expects the Monitor, which has a history of employing cartoonists, to hire a replacement for him.

The Christian Science Monitor News Service has been distributing Bennett's cartoons, and the newly hired Times Free Press staffer said he's interested in signing with another syndicate to distribute the work he'll do for the Chattanooga paper.

Tom Griscom, publisher and executive editor of the Times Free Press, said Bennett's work will appear in color on the front page of the Perspective section each Sunday and four times a week in black-and-white on the daily editorial pages.

Bennett, who said his cartoons will still run in color on the Web, noted that he enjoys working in black-and-white. He creates his Monitor cartoons in black-and-white before adding color towards the end of the process.

Griscom also said: "The Times Free Press received inquiries from readers and from those in the cartoonist profession as to whether our newspaper would join the ranks of those jettisoning the position with the departure of Mr. Plante." The answer, obviously, is no.

Bennett -- a former president of the Association of American Editorial Cartoonists -- is now in the process of trying to sell his Massachusetts home and "move five people, three cats, and one guinea pig" to Tennessee in two months.


October 30, 2007

Some interesting stats

We get lots of statistics from our cartoon database and I thought I would share a couple of stats here. Usually no one cartoon stands out above the rest as "most viewed" - but this month one cartoon dwarfs all the others in views, by a huge margin. The cartoon is "Gay Dumbledore" by Terry "Aislin" Mosher, below right. What does this tell us about our audience? hmmm. We have a new system for making comments on cartoons! Click here to leave a comment on the Gay Dumbledore cartoon.

We also get a good idea of what is on readers' minds by what they search for. Here is the list of most popular search terms this month on politicalcartoons.com:

Bush
Iraq
Global warming
Immigration
George Bush
China
Congress
Abortion
Education
10 Iran
11 War
12 Hillary Clinton
13 Canada
14 School
15 Russia
16 Environment
17 Obesity
18 Iraq war
19 Media
20 Money
21 Hillary
22 Election
23 Supreme court
24 President Bush
25 Clinton


October 27, 2007

Alli Dilem from Algeria joins our site

I'm delighted to announce that Algerian cartoonist Ali Dilem has joined our site. Ali has been battling the government in Algeria for a long time, facing prosecution for insulting government officials there. See my Quicktime interview with Ali from 2005. See Ali's cartoons below. His cartoons are likely to make some of our readers angry - just keep in mind that he makes the Algerian officials even angrier. See Ali's cartoon archive here. E-mail Ali.












October 27, 2007

Emerging from my funk

I've been getting complaints from readers that I haven't been drawing enough cartoons. Cartoonists complain about me not answering e-mails. Sorry, I'm just now emerging from my yearly funk ­ finishing our annual "Best Political Cartoons of the Year" book. I'll be returning to the regular world any time now.

That's the book on the right. We just sent it off to the publisher and it is slated to be in bookstores at the beginning of December, in time for Christmas. It sounds kind of silly to be finishing the "Best of the Year" book in October, but that's what it takes to get the book into the stores at the time when people want to buy it. I guess it's really the best of the fiscal year, October to October. I hope nothing happens in the next couple of months.

It is also kind of silly to call the book "2008 Edition" when it contains cartoons from 2007. There are a couple of unsatisfying reasons for that - first, the book will be on sale throughout 2008, and the publisher thinks it would look old if it had the previous year on the cover. Also, a competing "Best of" book inflates the year in the same way, so if we put 2007 on the cover, it would look like the competing book is newer than ours. Crazy how inflation works.

It will take a few more days for me to fully re-emerge.


October 10, 2007

Chattanooga will Hire a New Cartoonist

The Chattanooga Times-Free Press will be hiring a new cartoonist to replace Bruce Plants, who is moving to the Tulsa World. Given the way things had been going lately, it seemed likely that Bruce's chair in Chattanooga would be left empty - now that's not a worry. Here is the ad for the job:

The Chattanooga (Tenn.) Times Free Press is seeking a cartoonist for its opinion pages. The newspaper has two editorial pages, the Chattanooga Times and the Chattanooga Free Press. A successful applicant must be an independent thinker who can bridge liberal and conservative points of view, providing thoughtful visual commentary on the news of the day.

At least 50 percent of the cartoonist's work must highlight state and local issues of interest to readers in southeastern Tennessee and northern Georgia. The Times Free Press cartoonist's work will appear regularly on both editorial pages, depending on tone and topic. On Sunday, the cartoonist will provide a cover-quality color cartoon for the newspaper's Perspectives section.

The Times Free Press (average daily circulation 75,000, Sunday's 97,000) is a stable, independent newspaper with a strong commitment to community news. This job represents a substantial opportunity for experienced and/or up-and-coming applicants.

Please send resume and 5 cartoon samples as close as possible to 800 X 600 pixels at 72 dpi in jpeg format to: cartoonist@timesfreepress.com

My buddy Jimmy Margulies asked me to post that he has won first place in the "Party Toons" editorial cartoon contest. Mike Keefe took second place with his cartoon below. The Party Toons contest is associated with a show that is being put together for PBS, starring our own Will Durst, covering the news of the week in editorial cartoons.





October 5, 2007

Bruce Plante will Move to Tulsa

Bruce Plante of the Chattanooga Times Free Press will be moving to fill Doug Marlette's spot at the Tulsa World. Marlette died earlier this year and portfolios have been pouring in to the Tulsa World, since the paper announced that they would be refilling the position. It is a much larger newspaper for Bruce and we congratulate him on his upcoming move.


September 30, 2007

Some Reader Comments on Cox & Forkum's Retirement

YOUR CARTOONS WILL BE GREATLY MISSED BY THOSE OF US WHO FEEL EXACTLY AS YOU. WISHING YOU SUCCESS ­Lynne Masters


I'm really saddened to hear that this editorial cartoon team is coming to an end, but I very much understand the importance of family and getting out of the negative sludge war that is the political environment of modern America. I've taken a break myself. I hope at some point maybe you'll consider resuming. Who knows, but regardless it has been a pleasure and an honor to have enjoyed your work so much.
Guys, Thanks for so many laughs and memorable comments on things that matter so much to me in a manner that is so far from the a typical mainstream.
Bobby Scarbrough
I enjoyed your discussion in the Cagle Newsletter. The Cop & kid is the only one I had seen in our local press. I'm impressed by the other cartoons presented. Sorry to see your voice and influence go.
-- Bob Morrow
PLEASE DO NOT abandon us Conservatives, in the cesspool of Liberal Political Cartoons. ! Who is left to speak for us and provide some much needed balance to this very important form of communication!

Jackee Allen, NJ


We will miss you.
W. Hale
I understand and respect your reasons for retiring. However, I feel a great sense of loss. I am an editorial cartoon junkie (there are about 25 cartoonists on my favorites list which I read every day), and often embed a cartoon or so in my political comments. You are one of my two or three primary sources and I will miss your work.
Captain Robert R. Proctor
United States Navy (retired)
I'm sorry, but there are not enough conservative cartoonist around. Keep up the good work!
Wilfred K. Weidler
You guys will be sorely missed. Hope you do find time to draw and write again. Best wishes and good luck.
Hugh Chaney
As a guy others might call a liberal (I'm not) I'm sorry to lose a conservative (and intelligent - not an oxymoron) voice in the political cartoon universe.
Whatever, best to you, and if you come back, I'll welcome (and sometimes deride) your voice.
Rich McCleod
Please reconsider, for you are indeed the voice and thoughts for those of use who do not have your irreplaceable gift!
Philip Hollander
as a conservative i will miss you will you stop all together or will you be in newspapers anywhere?
Jim Fridas - a fan


September 30, 2007

The Cartoonist Team of Cox & Forkum is Calling it Quits

I was saddened to hear that the conservative editorial cartooning team of John Cox and Allen Forkum are retiring from editorial cartooning. We only recently added them to our site, and I was enjoying their work. They are unusual for being a team (a writer and a cartoonist) and are also unusual for being conservative cartoonists in a profession that is liberal leaning. E-mail Cox & Forkum.

I had a few questions for John and Allen, here is our conversation:

Daryl: I was disappointed to hear that you are quitting political cartooning. I've noticed your cartoons all over the web, and I'm sure you have fans on our site, so it looked like you were a self-syndicating success. What are your reasons for quitting?

Allen: I wrote about my reasons on our site. In short, it's mainly because I need to focus more attention on my publishing business, which is how I make a living, and focus less attention on daily politics. I no longer want to expend so much creative energy on the negative aspects of life. My hat is off to all the cartoonists, columnists and bloggers who can do it year in and year out.

John: I'll miss working over ideas with Allen, but ultimately I've been more interested in my paintings and other less political projects. In fact I'm working on a project comic-book project with writer Jeff Racho that'll probably be out in November. Lots of fun stuff to do out there that doesn't involve divisive subject matter.

Allen: Also, I don't know how much we qualify as a self-syndicating success. We did generate some income, mostly by self-publishing our own books and selling other products. We had a few publication and Internet subscribers, but that was never a big revenue source. I wasn't able to consistently put in the necessary time for marketing our cartoons to publications. Practically all of our clients found us through our Web site.

I will say this: I've been impressed at what's possible in our digital world. From the Web site to print-on-demand books, it's amazing what one or two people can accomplish if they have the knowledge to put it all together.

Daryl: I can't think of any other teams of artists and writers who do editorial cartoons; how did being a team effect your work and your decision to quit?

Allen: Editorial cartooning is not exactly a career for getting rich. A team is at a further disadvantage in the marketplace, because it can't charge more simply because there are two people. There's also the added challenge of collaborating in such an opinion-based medium. Fortunately John and I are pretty close when it comes to philosophy and politics, so there weren't too many conflicts.

John: Learning to collaborate was hard for me. I tend to be rather stubborn when it comes to personal aesthetics. I had to rein in my tendency toward humor to get at the real essence of Allen's approach to political cartoons -- controversial matter requires a serious approach. Thankfully, Allen was (and still is) patient enough to let me find my way and accomplish some of the best art I ever produced.

Allen: John and I have known each other since the early '80s. We went to art school together and were roommates for a time. We have years of common experience to draw upon when working out an idea. If I think of an idea based on a famous old photograph or John finds inspiration in a classical painting, odds are we know exactly what the other is talking about. John's also a better illustrator than I am, and I'm better as a political commentator. Together we created something we couldn't create separately. Our guiding principle when working together is: What serves the idea? Everything else we try to ruthlessly slashed away.

But probably he most difficult aspect was learning to communicate long distance about the cartoons. We live in different cities. Out of over a thousand cartoons, we've created maybe six cartoons together while we were in the same room.

Daryl: What are your favorite cartoons?

John: I prefer the silly ones. One of my new favorites was a recent one where I drew Ahmadinejad as a pleading child confronting a New York cop. Cracks me up every time I look at it. We used a famous photo for that piece and it really turned out well.

I also happen to get a big kick out of the more surreal pieces. I'm at my best when I'm making stuff up as opposed having to depict real environments and situations that require lots of draftsmanship.

Here's another one I enjoyed drawing:


Mosque space ship. Alien pigs. What's not to enjoy?

Allen: My favorites are cartoons with a powerful, immediate impact, which usually means they're iconic and have little or no dialogue. A recent favorite of mine:

 

A cartoon like this can speak directly to a viewer, almost on an emotional level. This happens to be one that didn't appeal to John from the drawing side, because of the necessary drafting.

I also like these two for the same reasons:


These two happened to play right into John's strengths. The snakes being so large allowed John to include lots of detail, giving them a creepy feel. And the creationism cartoon has a great reference, of course. But John is himself a painter, so he knew just how to illustrate the artist and his tools.

Daryl: Do you foresee doing editorial cartoons again? Ever?

Allen: As a regular gig, no. We might occasionally produce a cartoon, if something in the news gets under my skin deeply enough. But I plan to stay away from closely following politics for a while.

John: I'll be dabbling in editorial cartoons every once in a while. I've developed a healthy respect for sharp political commentary, and I'm interested in trying new ways of showing off my perspective on things. At my blog, John Cox Art, I'm posting everything from paintings to caricatures to comics .

Daryl: We're always hearing from editors who complain that most editorial cartoons are liberal and who tell us that they want to see more conservative editorial cartoons. You are unusual for being conservative cartoonists. What is your experience with that? Does that matter?

Allen: I haven't had much experience with that. All our clients had right-of center editorial pages. No left-of-center publication ever contacted us about providing an alternative perspective. But ultimately I don't think it should matter. One should do the cartoons one feels passionate about.

Daryl: There are very few examples of successful self-syndicating editorial cartoonists. Most editorial cartoonists who don't have full-time jobs do it for the love of it, and make their living doing something else. Do you have any comments on the terrible business climate for editorial cartoonists - with newspapers dying and web sites unwilling to pay for content?

Allen: Only that that's just the nature of today's marketplace, and cartoonists have to market themselves accordingly. But I don't have an inside perspective of that end of the business. It was never possible that some publication would hire two guys to do one cartoon. So we've straddled both worlds from the beginning. It's tough. I'm not sure what the future holds, but if our experience is any indication (and I'm not saying it is), then cartoonists may have to start doing more to market, publish, and distribute their own work. There will always be some publications that will hire full-time cartoonists. But they seem to be fewer and fewer. The remaining cartoonists will have to seek out or invent new venues for their work.


September 21, 2007

CARTOON RIOTS IN BANGLADESH

A new round of Muhammad cartoon rioting broke out in Bangladesh, protesting the cartoon at the right, which depicts a boy telling a mullah that he has named his cat "Muhammad." Police with batons beat back protestors in Dhaka yesterday.

The cartoonist, Arifur Rahman, has been held in jail for a month after the government said his drawings had insulted Muslims. Bangladesh's home minister is quoted saying that Rahman had "hurt the sentiments of the people." The cartoon was published in the satirical magazine, "Alpin." And reprinted in the nation's leading Bangla-language newspaper.

Bangladesh is under military rule since January when elections were cancelled after vote-rigging allegations led to the army taking power. Seizing and banning publications seems to be a popular thing for the Bangladesh military government to do now.


September 13, 2007

More General Dog Comments

I like it. Spot on (pun intended) The two critics you posted below the cartoon should think
themselves lucky they live in the states where political satire seems to be quite restrained. Steve Bells' depiction of Bush/Blair in the UK would probably have them foaming at the mouth and demanding armed intervention to silence (antiamerican/antiwar/anticoalition) free speech. I won't even suggest they try Bill Leak et al: in Australia, as their depictions of Bush and Howard would, I'm sure, verge on the blasphemous in their view.

The web is a great way to access forign print and audio media. Use it to expand your horizons rather than moaning about one cartoon, which reflects the way most of the world sees this "war" on terror.

Ewan, Oz.


Hi Daryl,

I thought both Petraeus cartoons hit the nail and revealed the 'nitty gritty' that many of us like to pretend is just conspiracy theory.

I t never ceases to amaze how we continue to fool ourselves.
George Orwell called it 'doublethink'.

Regards....Garth
Right on track! Dead Iraqies don't count???
Dave from Florida
Yes I I believe the Dog goes too far. The general is not a fierce fighting dog. He is more like a Mockingbird, repeating everything here is from the commander in chief. Quoting without thinking, seeing without acknowledging. Maybe that's why this war has lasted so long. If the generals on the ground do not believe with the commander,they are fired. We need a realistic person in charge of Iraq.

Our military is not yet fighting a real guerrilla warfare. Nor have we choosing to fight the enemy from 9/11 lessons have not been learned from Vietnam.
ZAW


Seems to me that if you had general dog righteously chewing on the bones of terrorists, that would be much better. Having him chained to Dubyah's side is obviously much worse somehow.

Of course Petraeus would speak the party line. All the dissenting dogs have been cut loose and buried!

Jeff D, OH
Too bad it is too EERILY true!!!!
Robert M. Valdez
I find that cartoon about Gen. Petraeus VERY insulting... to dogs.

Wiley Miller


I take no offense at portraying a general as a dog, or a dog as a general for that matter. If the shoe fits or in this case if the clothes fit, I say wear them. Good job, Mr. Cagle, keep it up.
Danny , San Francisco CA
For some, "the truth is what I (or my lap dogs) say it is." I wonder who said that?
Rigan
September 13, 2007

Phil Frank has Died

I was saddened to read today that cartoonist Phil Frank died - only days after announcing his retirement.

More Comments on General Dog

My e-mail box is still humming with passionalte comments about my General Dog cartoon. Here are some more comments ...

From: Dan Tidrick
Subject: Good Dog Cartoon

I've enjoyed your cartoons, even though I don't always agree with the politics. However, I can't think of a worst time to do this one, considering the date of 9/11. I also respect General Petraous as a professional and well spoken soldier which also contributes to my opinion that this cartoon was in bad taste. I think you offended the military as well as most of us that cared about 9/11. Out of Bounds!! Dan Tidrick


From: Dan Corley

The General is a man who stands on his own. He is on no one's leash. Pulling out and abandoning this was and these people would be another Vietnam where we did NOT lose. We QUIT and millions paid the price
L.D. Bruce, WW II


Subject: General Dog - Claims That Can't Be Falsified

Mr. Cagle:

The use of a dog caricature of General Petraeus doesn't bother me (or impress me, either).

The logic of the cartoon seems to follow a last resort tactic of those confronted with evidence they don't like. If the evidence goes their way, well, that of course proves that they were right all along. If the evidence goes against them, that just shows, somehow, that they were right all along, since the evidence can't possibly be trusted.

The attempt to discredit the evidence that goes against your expectations does bother me. It was not possible, apparently, that the evidence, i.e., Petraeus' testimony, would ever be construed as invalidating your position, just like the arguments of creationists which can never be falsified.

John Kannarr
Your hatred of Bush blinds you to the realities of the peril America faces
from terrorists.

And for the record, I AM offended by the other cartoons as well.

Jackee Allen
This cartoon is such an insult not only to General David Petraeus, but to our entire military. The general is not a lap dog of the president. He is a leader of our troops and to stoop so low is a humiliation to all who serve.

Disgusting!

Arlene DiRocco
Burlington, MA
I am offended by this cartoon portraying General Petraeus as Dog on a leash from the Administration. I listened carefully to the General's testimony, with particularity to his opening remarks in which he stated very clearly that the opinions given were strictly his own and that he alone had written his statement. To portray the General as a Dog on a leash is demeaning to the General's accomplishments and is in no way indicative of the respect owed, not only to the General, but to every man who has served this Country.
S. Ralph Gordon PC , Nashville
Well, I'll be doggoned ­ what I would like to know is why in a democracy we have totally become reliant on the military for all thinking ­ we used to be a civil democracy.
And just in case you think I am anti-military ­ I come from a naval family.
Jara D. Roux
I think a picture of a parrot would have been better and less irritating to some folks. Of course you could simply have made Bush a little closer to a Michael Vick character and then ­ oh my!!
Bill Newton, Berkeley, CA

Bet you never served our country - takes a sick person to put out this type of crap
R Maxon

Knowing the PRESSURE that the GENERAL is Under, & also as ONE that Believes WE should GET OUT ASAP,I still think the CARTOON As well as the Move On Paid Article in the NY Times Went Over the EDGE. GOD BLESS ALL (Including the GENERALS) OUR TROOPS
Frank Mitchell

The cartoons hit the nail on the head.
I voted for the democrats to get something done, and all they have done is back down.

which one is the dog?
Cyndy, Long beach

I don't particularly object to a general portrayed as a dog, but perhaps VP Chaney should be holding any leash. Actually, I'm inclined to believe that although the general knows his place in the chain of command, that he was speaking the truth as he knows and/or believes it to be.
In any event, if the role of a political cartoon is to stimulate thought -- you succeeded.

Bad doggie! The dog has gone to far but not Cagle.
Jean Waller, Sherman Oaks, CA

I think the cartoon was a little bit of a low blow. Suggesting that General Petraeus --- as well respected as he is --- would yield to Bush's desires is probably not true and certainly not fair. Petraeus is much brighter and more experienced in such matters than Bush in my opinion. In addition he has surrounded himself with very qualified people, including commanders from other nations ­ all, like him, well educated and men of proven honor. When you damn Petraeus you damn them too.

In short, I think Petraeus is very capable of giving Bush an ear full.

Michael R. Losey, SPHR, CAE


Yes ! Degrading people based on your political preferences does nothing to promote civility and respect for anyone. If you've got proof that he said what someone, anyone-- Bush-- his Commander etc,told him to say, instead of what he believes then lay him out. But if you're just a parrot for a political party then you need to tell the world that you're the dummy whose strings are being pulled, not your victim.
Bobby Weaver

How can you call yourself an American and put out this Kind of garbage.
Jim Dexter
Lafayette, In

Maybe your readers are angry because the truth hurts sometimes. As for the unpatriotic remark, it isn't very patriotic to lie to an entire country so your buddies in the oil and weapons business can increase their profit margins. The people that desstroyed the world trade center didn't like Saddam either. He sure as hell wasn't a fundamental extremist, so we did Bin and the boys a favor by opening Iraq up for them. Prior to that all they had was a few caves on the Pakistan border, but we couldn't go in there and get them cause then the war would be over before Unocal got their new pipeline built in Afghanistan. So I contend that in the name of patriotism the power and money people get to continue playing their games, while our kids bleed all over the Middle East.
John Parker

Mr. Cagle:
I loved the Doggie General cartoon! Keep up the good work -- and I would say so EVEN IF I personally agreed with Petraeus or thought that his report was truly objective and independent. Please do not be discouraged by those who call the cartoon unpatriotic or unAmerican. Dissent is considered by many to be the highest form of patriotism. And mindless deference to authority is more characteristic of Nazi Germany, Soviet Russia, and modern-day China than it has ever been of America. By satirizing these very serious issues, your humor reaches out to your narrow-minded critics; hopefully some of them will be changed for the better.
Keep on keeping on.
Autumn Spritzer, Tucson, AZ

I loved it. Very astute
--jiniwhite
September 11, 2007

General Dog on Iraq

My latest cartoon, a comment on General Petraeus' report to congress on progress in Iraq, has drawn an unusually spirited response from readers. I find that interesting, because a couple of weeks ago I drew a general standing in a field of dead Iraqi civilians, saying, " I'm pleased to report that we're seen a recent decrease in the fighting in Iraq" - and this cartoon got no reader response. Drawing a general as a dog touches nerves - showing a general indifferent to the death around him gets no reader reaction. Go figure.

What do you think? Does the dog go too far? You can e-mail us with your comments on my general-dog cartoon.

Here are some reactions so far:


I've enjoyed your cartoons until this one today! How anti-American and unpatriotic this is. Perhaps you should consider the hero's of 9/11 rather than this sarcasm you have sent out!!!

Terry David


Typical Defeatocrat wisdom. Alcoholics deny also!!
Phil Jones
Typical of a Liberal Left, America hating, lunatic in denial of reality.
Your hatred of Bush blinds you to the realities of the peril America faces
from terrorists. And for the record, I AM offended by the other cartoons as well.
Jackee Allen
This cartoon is such an insult not only to General David Petraeus, but to our entire military. The general is not a lap dog of the president. He is a leader of our troops and to stoop so low is a humiliation to all who serve.

Disgusting!

Arlene DiRocco
Burlington, MA
I am offended by this cartoon portraying General Petraeus as Dog on a leash from the Administration. I listened carefully to the General's testimony, with particularity to his opening remarks in which he stated very clearly that the opinions given were strictly his own and that he alone had written his statement. To portray the General as a Dog on a leash is demeaning to the General's accomplishments and is in no way indicative of the respect owed, not only to the General, but to every man who has served this Country.
S. Ralph Gordon PC , Nashville
Well, I'll be doggoned ­ what I would like to know is why in a democracy we have totally become reliant on the military for all thinking ­ we used to be a civil democracy.
And just in case you think I am anti-military ­ I come from a naval family.
Jara D. Roux
I think a picture of a parrot would have been better and less irritating to some folks. Of course you could simply have made Bush a little closer to a Michael Vick character and then ­ oh my!!
Bill Newton, Berkeley, CA
Bet you never served our country - takes a sick person to put out this type of crap
R Maxon
Knowing the PRESSURE that the GENERAL is Under, & also as ONE that Believes WE should GET OUT ASAP,I still think the CARTOON As well as the Move On Paid Article in the NY Times Went Over the EDGE. GOD BLESS ALL (Including the GENERALS) OUR TROOPS
Frank Mitchell
The cartoons hit the nail on the head.
I voted for the democrats to get something done, and all they have done is back down.
which one is the dog?
Cyndy, Long beach
I don't particularly object to a general portrayed as a dog, but perhaps VP Chaney should be holding any leash. Actually, I'm inclined to believe that although the general knows his place in the chain of command, that he was speaking the truth as he knows and/or believes it to be.
In any event, if the role of a political cartoon is to stimulate thought -- you succeeded.
Bad doggie! The dog has gone to far but not Cagle.
Jean Waller, Sherman Oaks, CA
I think the cartoon was a little bit of a low blow. Suggesting that General Petraeus --- as well respected as he is --- would yield to Bush's desires is probably not true and certainly not fair. Petraeus is much brighter and more experienced in such matters than Bush in my opinion. In addition he has surrounded himself with very qualified people, including commanders from other nations ­ all, like him, well educated and men of proven honor. When you damn Petraeus you damn them too.

In short, I think Petraeus is very capable of giving Bush an ear full.

Michael R. Losey, SPHR, CAE


Yes ! Degrading people based on your political preferences does nothing to promote civility and respect for anyone. If you've got proof that he said what someone, anyone-- Bush-- his Commander etc,told him to say, instead of what he believes then lay him out. But if you're just a parrot for a political party then you need to tell the world that you're the dummy whose strings are being pulled, not your victim.
Bobby Weaver
How can you call yourself an American and put out this Kind of garbage.
Jim Dexter
Lafayette, In
Maybe your readers are angry because the truth hurts sometimes. As for the unpatriotic remark, it isn't very patriotic to lie to an entire country so your buddies in the oil and weapons business can increase their profit margins. The people that desstroyed the world trade center didn't like Saddam either. He sure as hell wasn't a fundamental extremist, so we did Bin and the boys a favor by opening Iraq up for them. Prior to that all they had was a few caves on the Pakistan border, but we couldn't go in there and get them cause then the war would be over before Unocal got their new pipeline built in Afghanistan. So I contend that in the name of patriotism the power and money people get to continue playing their games, while our kids bleed all over the Middle East.
John Parker
Mr. Cagle:
I loved the Doggie General cartoon! Keep up the good work -- and I would say so EVEN IF I personally agreed with Petraeus or thought that his report was truly objective and independent. Please do not be discouraged by those who call the cartoon unpatriotic or unAmerican. Dissent is considered by many to be the highest form of patriotism. And mindless deference to authority is more characteristic of Nazi Germany, Soviet Russia, and modern-day China than it has ever been of America. By satirizing these very serious issues, your humor reaches out to your narrow-minded critics; hopefully some of them will be changed for the better.
Keep on keeping on.
Autumn Spritzer, Tucson, AZ
I loved it. Very astute
--jiniwhite

September 6, 2007

Another Local Political Cartoon Loss

Phil Frank, who has drawn the local, political strip, "Farley" for the San Francisco Chronicle for 32 years, is retiring the strip this Friday. With the recent loss of Leo Garza's "Nacho Guarache" in the San Antonio Express-News, that leaves Ed Stein's "Denver Square" in the Rocky Mountain News as the only daily, local political strip in a major daily newspaper.

Farley ran on our site for quite a while. Frank continues to collaborate on a syndicated comic strip, "The Elderberries" with writer Corey Randolph.


September 5, 2007

Animated Editorial Cartoons? Sorry, No.

Here's an interesting blog post about how cartoonist Mike Shelton recently lost his job at the Orange County (CA) Register. Mike participated on our site for a couple of years. He's is a great guy and, unfortunately, is no longer drawing regular editorial cartoons. He plans on concentrating on animation. Mike's departure from the Register was less than cordial and should come as a disturbing lesson to the many editorial cartoonists who advocate doing animated editorial cartoons to make a cartoonist more valuable to his newspaper.

WELCOME BACK, PEDRO

I'd like to welcome Nicaraguan cartoonist, Pedro X. Molina, back to the site. That's Pedro's Michael Moore below. It's nice to have you here again, Pedro! Send Pedro a "welcome back" e-mail.


September 4, 2007

No Prison for Spanish Cartoonist

There are reports today that Spanish cartoonist, Guillermo and writer Manel Fontdevilla have been fined 3,600 Euros for "injuries to the crown." They could have been sentenced to two years in prison.

The offending cartoon prompted a Spanish judge to remove all copies of the magazine from newstands throughout Spain. Read all about it here. Thanks to Journalista.


CLICK HERE TO GO TO THE July/August 2007, CAGLE WEB LOG


Artwork © each artist. The Professional Cartoonists Index is ©Daryl Cagle. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction prohibited.