As President Obama and the national Democrat establishment gear up for their billion-dollar-plus 2012 election campaign, insiders connected to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid are hatching plans to protect the tenuous Senate Democrat majority. Those Reid insiders are forming a "super" Political Action Committee, called Majority PAC, to raise unlimited money in order to go on the offensive in Senate races throughout the country.
Reid's people are within their rights to form the PAC thanks to the Citizens United v. FEC victory at the United States Supreme Court last year. Now all Americans are free to utilize their free speech rights in this way. However, because the entire Democrat Party machinery was against this landmark decision last year, this blatant reversal reeks of hypocrisy. President Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid spent an inordinate amount of time attacking the decision and trying to defeat it through legislative means; meanwhile they lost their majority in the House and now have a fading majority in the Senate.
In the days after the Supreme Court ruled in Citizens United's favor, President Obama verbally assaulted the Supreme Court Justices for their decision at the State of the Union. President Obama said, "With all due deference to separation of powers, last week the Supreme Court reversed a century of law that I believe will open the floodgates for special interests - including foreign corporations - to spend without limit in our elections." This unseemly attack on the few people in the chamber who could not respond and defend themselves showed the true character of the President.
In addition to his outburst during the State of the Union, President Obama made it a daily habit to bash the Citizens United v. FEC Supreme Court decision. From his weekly radio addresses to speeches on the stump, President Obama seemed obsessed with casting sinister aspersions on the decision. In one instance he ominously said, "But this summer, they're also seeing a flood of attack ads run by shadowy groups with harmless-sounding names." I wonder if President Obama will be making those same kinds of statements about the Democrat super PACs that will come to his defense in 2012 when his own name is on the ballot?
In an attempt to undercut the high court's Citizens United decision, the entire Democrat caucus in the Senate voted to pass the deceptively named DISCLOSE Act twice last year. The DISCLOSE Act was not about meaningful campaign finance reform, but was an unconstitutional incumbent protection act that sought to limit free speech. In drafting the bill, the Democrat Party's leadership played politics with the First Amendment by providing unfair carve-outs to special interest groups. Thankfully, Harry Reid failed to push it through and another disastrous infringement on our Constitutional rights was avoided. With the formation of their own "super PAC," Senate Democrats won't have a leg to stand on if they continue to try to attack the Citizens United v. FEC Supreme Court decision and I expect any further discussion of the DISCLOSE Act to quietly disappear.
President Obama, who took such great pleasure in condemning "shadowy" groups for exercising their First Amendment right to criticize public officials in the 2010 cycle, will benefit greatly from the attack ads that will be run through the Majority PAC. With the recent hemorrhage of West Wing staffers, I would venture to say that more liberal super PACs will conveniently begin popping up to support President Obama and the Democrat Party in the coming months.
Citizens United was a great victory for free speech and I am sure President Obama and his Democrat friends will take full advantage of it in the 2012 cycle, as is their right. It is just hypocritical that when President Obama, Harry Reid, and Nancy Pelosi were facing historic defeats in the 2010 elections, they claimed the decision would end our democratic way of life. Now that they see an opportunity to utilize it for the 2012 race, I'm sure our case will suddenly become as American as apple pie.